So, as you can see from the lateest bumper 16 page first in a
series edition of Pugwash News, elections are upon us.
I’m not going to preach to you about why
you should get involved, I am going to discuss the role of UPSU media. News, current affairs and anything timely
comes under my job description, which means the elections and particularly how
the printed and online media cover them becomes my responsibility. This on one
hand means that I have news to write on without looking too far, which has its
benefits considering the exams, deadlines and whatever else is being demanded
of me by my degree. However, a whole new
dilemma appears when covering elections. One that has got me slightly stumped
and baffled: should we cover elections? How do we cover them fairly and without
showing bias or appearing to show bias?
The BBC and the mainstream press have a similar dilemma when
it comes to general elections. When it comes to general elections the BBC have
a responsibility to cover the current government and the official opposition
along with Liberal Democrats in equal measures. This works fine, however with
the UPSU sabbatical elections the number of candidates can be huge, and to
mention everyone would involve having a paper four times the size and me having
the long overdue heart attack.
So where do we go? Do we only report on candidates doing
interesting things? But then who defines interesting?
We could just ignore the whole process but that would then
fail my primary aim, which is to try and educate and stimulate debate amongst you
our readers.
I’m lost and my brain hurts, am I over reacting? Is this
just a huge collection of pig laws or do I have reason to fret?